<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem of Eve&#8217;s Submission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:22:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kiskilili</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53011</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiskilili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 00:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53011</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I really am nice! I swear I don&#039;t know where these fangs came from, or the fur--it&#039;s only by the moonlight of certain issues that I look like a werewolf or sound like I&#039;m snarling! 

Just kidding. Glad you don&#039;t feel pounced on. :)

&lt;blockquote&gt;And thus we see Kiskilili’s true heretical colors come through . . .&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Next I&#039;ll be claiming the Holy Spirit processes only from the Father and not the Son.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I really am nice! I swear I don&#8217;t know where these fangs came from, or the fur&#8211;it&#8217;s only by the moonlight of certain issues that I look like a werewolf or sound like I&#8217;m snarling! </p>
<p>Just kidding. Glad you don&#8217;t feel pounced on. <img src='http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p>And thus we see Kiskilili’s true heretical colors come through . . .</p></blockquote>
<p>Next I&#8217;ll be claiming the Holy Spirit processes only from the Father and not the Son.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jddaughter</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53010</link>
		<dc:creator>jddaughter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 23:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53010</guid>
		<description>YAY Amanda!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YAY Amanda!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53005</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53005</guid>
		<description>Fresh meat!  mwa-ha-ha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fresh meat!  mwa-ha-ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vada</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53004</link>
		<dc:creator>Vada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 22:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53004</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m so glad you don&#039;t feel pounced on -- we really are nice, but like you said, a nerve. :)  And we love new fans -- and new friends.  We&#039;re glad to have you around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad you don&#8217;t feel pounced on &#8212; we really are nice, but like you said, a nerve. <img src='http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   And we love new fans &#8212; and new friends.  We&#8217;re glad to have you around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53002</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 19:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53002</guid>
		<description>No worries ladies.  I don&#039;t feel pounced on.  I obviously hit a nerve.  I&#039;ll give up on the analogy for now, as I&#039;m knee deep in dissertation writing...but I&#039;ll definitely ponder your responses over the next few days.  And your blog has a new fan. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No worries ladies.  I don&#8217;t feel pounced on.  I obviously hit a nerve.  I&#8217;ll give up on the analogy for now, as I&#8217;m knee deep in dissertation writing&#8230;but I&#8217;ll definitely ponder your responses over the next few days.  And your blog has a new fan. <img src='http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynnette</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53000</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynnette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-53000</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;(Now I feel a bit like an Arian.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And thus we see Kiskilili&#039;s true heretical colors come through . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>(Now I feel a bit like an Arian.)</p></blockquote>
<p>And thus we see Kiskilili&#8217;s true heretical colors come through . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiskilili</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52998</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiskilili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52998</guid>
		<description>Anyway, Amanda--sorry if you feel pounced on. :( This issue obviously hits a nerve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, Amanda&#8211;sorry if you feel pounced on. <img src='http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  This issue obviously hits a nerve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiskilili</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52997</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiskilili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52997</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;But do we view Jesus Christ less important than God? I don’t think so. We view them very differently. We pray to Heavenly Father. We worship Jesus Christ as our Saviour. Why don’t we pray to Jesus Christ? Is God more important than Jesus Christ? Are God and Jesus Christ not equal? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I actually think there&#039;s a good case to be made that we do view Jesus as inferior and subordinate to God (especially pre-Resurrection)--Jesus submits to God&#039;s plan to fulfill God&#039;s purposes, not the other way around, and he does it for God&#039;s glory. (Now I feel a bit like an Arian.)

&lt;blockquote&gt;This is the way I see how it is possible for women to be submissive but equal. Men and women are equally valuable as spirit children of God but different in their roles.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It sounds like you&#039;re resolving the tension by saying women and men are equal in &lt;em&gt;value&lt;/em&gt; but not necessarily equal in &lt;em&gt;power&lt;/em&gt;. I don&#039;t think this resolves it at all. If women are equally valued or equally capable or equally accountable, why aren&#039;t they gave the same quality relationship with God?

It seems that more burden is being placed on women to create unity in marriage (by deferring their own needs or desires) than is being placed on men. This just doesn&#039;t seem fair to me. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;I covenanted to submit to my husband when he submits to God. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

There are two ways of understanding the covenant--you submit to your husband &lt;em&gt;when&lt;/em&gt; he submits to God, or you submit to your husband &lt;em&gt;in the same way&lt;/em&gt; that he submits to God. Although I realize the former interpretation has become quite popular, I think everything in the context militates in favor of the latter--women are placed in a relationship to their husbands that their husbands are placed to God. In any case, why would women promise to submit to their husbands if the intent is that they actually submit to God? The husband has then become superfluous to the structure. Also, why should women have to wait until their husbands submit to God (as this text has it) before they themselves submit to God? There&#039;s no way around it: women don&#039;t have the same quality relationship with God that men do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>But do we view Jesus Christ less important than God? I don’t think so. We view them very differently. We pray to Heavenly Father. We worship Jesus Christ as our Saviour. Why don’t we pray to Jesus Christ? Is God more important than Jesus Christ? Are God and Jesus Christ not equal? </p></blockquote>
<p>I actually think there&#8217;s a good case to be made that we do view Jesus as inferior and subordinate to God (especially pre-Resurrection)&#8211;Jesus submits to God&#8217;s plan to fulfill God&#8217;s purposes, not the other way around, and he does it for God&#8217;s glory. (Now I feel a bit like an Arian.)</p>
<blockquote><p>This is the way I see how it is possible for women to be submissive but equal. Men and women are equally valuable as spirit children of God but different in their roles.</p></blockquote>
<p>It sounds like you&#8217;re resolving the tension by saying women and men are equal in <em>value</em> but not necessarily equal in <em>power</em>. I don&#8217;t think this resolves it at all. If women are equally valued or equally capable or equally accountable, why aren&#8217;t they gave the same quality relationship with God?</p>
<p>It seems that more burden is being placed on women to create unity in marriage (by deferring their own needs or desires) than is being placed on men. This just doesn&#8217;t seem fair to me. </p>
<blockquote><p>I covenanted to submit to my husband when he submits to God. </p></blockquote>
<p>There are two ways of understanding the covenant&#8211;you submit to your husband <em>when</em> he submits to God, or you submit to your husband <em>in the same way</em> that he submits to God. Although I realize the former interpretation has become quite popular, I think everything in the context militates in favor of the latter&#8211;women are placed in a relationship to their husbands that their husbands are placed to God. In any case, why would women promise to submit to their husbands if the intent is that they actually submit to God? The husband has then become superfluous to the structure. Also, why should women have to wait until their husbands submit to God (as this text has it) before they themselves submit to God? There&#8217;s no way around it: women don&#8217;t have the same quality relationship with God that men do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vada</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52996</link>
		<dc:creator>Vada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52996</guid>
		<description>The biggest problem I have with the Heavenly Father-Jesus and husband-wife parallel is also one of the biggest problems I have with the view/treatment of women in the church -- that they are children.  Too often things are grouped as &quot;men&quot; and &quot;women and children&quot;, while I think the grouping should be &quot;men and women&quot; and &quot;children&quot;.

While Christ is wonderful and perfect, and I do worship him, I still don&#039;t see the relationship between Heavenly Father and Jesus as one of equals.  They are one in purpose because Christ will always submit to the will of the Father.  He does this because, as Lynnette said, he is trying to learn, progress, and become more like the Father.  He is still the child in their relationship, and he is learning from His Father&#039;s greater experience.  Some day (according to Mormon theology as I understand it, at least), Christ and His wife will create worlds of their own, where He will be the Father, and He will send one of his own children as the Savior of those worlds, and they will have a similar relationship, but this time Christ will be the Father.

Since my husband is not some perfect being with more experience than I have, whose role and abilities I would like to have later in the eternities (though he is pretty awesome), I just don&#039;t see the relationships as parallel.  My husband is not my parent, and I think this analogy just perpetuates the ideas that men are more adult and more responsible than women -- an idea that I think is very harmful, for both sexes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest problem I have with the Heavenly Father-Jesus and husband-wife parallel is also one of the biggest problems I have with the view/treatment of women in the church &#8212; that they are children.  Too often things are grouped as &#8220;men&#8221; and &#8220;women and children&#8221;, while I think the grouping should be &#8220;men and women&#8221; and &#8220;children&#8221;.</p>
<p>While Christ is wonderful and perfect, and I do worship him, I still don&#8217;t see the relationship between Heavenly Father and Jesus as one of equals.  They are one in purpose because Christ will always submit to the will of the Father.  He does this because, as Lynnette said, he is trying to learn, progress, and become more like the Father.  He is still the child in their relationship, and he is learning from His Father&#8217;s greater experience.  Some day (according to Mormon theology as I understand it, at least), Christ and His wife will create worlds of their own, where He will be the Father, and He will send one of his own children as the Savior of those worlds, and they will have a similar relationship, but this time Christ will be the Father.</p>
<p>Since my husband is not some perfect being with more experience than I have, whose role and abilities I would like to have later in the eternities (though he is pretty awesome), I just don&#8217;t see the relationships as parallel.  My husband is not my parent, and I think this analogy just perpetuates the ideas that men are more adult and more responsible than women &#8212; an idea that I think is very harmful, for both sexes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynnette</title>
		<link>http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52993</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynnette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 15:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://zelophehadsdaughters.com/2008/12/29/the-problem-of-eves-submission/#comment-52993</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts.  One of the problems I have with the husband-wife / God-Jesus parallel is that, at least in my understanding, Jesus submits to the Father so that he can become more like him.  God doesn&#039;t require submission to keep Jesus (or the rest of us, for that matter) in our place; it&#039;s an aspect of eternal progression.  But surely wives don&#039;t submit to their husbands so that they can eventually become more like men. (!)  I&#039;m still thinking this out, but it seems to me that it might be useful to distinguish between submission which is a part of eternal development, which enables you to become more like the one you are following--and submission which is an eternal role.  

I&#039;m also troubled by a model of unity which places the costs on only one member of the partnership, in which the wife has to give up her identity in the name of some greater good, but a similar requirement isn&#039;t imposed on the husband.  And if the ultimate goal is for both parties to follow God, I don&#039;t understand why they don&#039;t both covenant directly with God.  One of the most empowering (and just cool) aspects of Mormonism, I think, is the notion that anyone can go directly to God and get answers; your relationship to him isn&#039;t mediated by any other mortal.  So it&#039;s kinda painful to see that potentially undermined in the context of husband-wife relationships.  For me, the statement that men and women are equally valued by God is cold comfort if I&#039;m not sure that God also values having a direct relationship with each of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts.  One of the problems I have with the husband-wife / God-Jesus parallel is that, at least in my understanding, Jesus submits to the Father so that he can become more like him.  God doesn&#8217;t require submission to keep Jesus (or the rest of us, for that matter) in our place; it&#8217;s an aspect of eternal progression.  But surely wives don&#8217;t submit to their husbands so that they can eventually become more like men. (!)  I&#8217;m still thinking this out, but it seems to me that it might be useful to distinguish between submission which is a part of eternal development, which enables you to become more like the one you are following&#8211;and submission which is an eternal role.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also troubled by a model of unity which places the costs on only one member of the partnership, in which the wife has to give up her identity in the name of some greater good, but a similar requirement isn&#8217;t imposed on the husband.  And if the ultimate goal is for both parties to follow God, I don&#8217;t understand why they don&#8217;t both covenant directly with God.  One of the most empowering (and just cool) aspects of Mormonism, I think, is the notion that anyone can go directly to God and get answers; your relationship to him isn&#8217;t mediated by any other mortal.  So it&#8217;s kinda painful to see that potentially undermined in the context of husband-wife relationships.  For me, the statement that men and women are equally valued by God is cold comfort if I&#8217;m not sure that God also values having a direct relationship with each of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
